Welcome, Classic Film Lovers!
Welcome to Sister Celluloid: Where Old Movies Go To Live! I’m so happy we found each other! Here, it’s all about classic films—and you! It’s a dialogue, not a monologue. Please take a look around, and jump in on every story that interests you. Stop by often, as I’ll be adding lots of great history, news, interviews, photos etc. And I’ll be running contests for fabulous prizes like vintage jewelry, great books and terrific DVDs and CDs! Please scroll through, dig in and pipe up! I’d love to hear from you!
A Thrilling Vera Miles Sighting! And a Link to One of Her (Too-Rare) Comedies
I’ve never been so excited to see someone taking out the garbage in my life. (At least I think what she’s doing here.)
This is Vera Miles, 95, absolutely killing it in Palm Springs in a lovely cotton ensemble and kicky hat to protect her from the sun, probably one reason she still looks great.

She’s always seemed like a private person, one who performed her scenes brilliantly on set and didn’t generate scenes elsewhere. And while she seems completely unruffled, I’m guessing whoever snapped this photo wasn’t invited to pop by and watch her perform mundane chores. So I feel guilty even reprinting it and loving it so much. But I have to admit I cried happy tears when I saw it. (Maybe you did too?)
Being a classic movie lover is the ultimate in unrequited love. Many of the stars we cherish were gone before we even saw their work and fell in love with them. And over the decades, watching them slip away has been one knife in the heart after another. I can honestly say I’ve cried longer and harder over many of them than I have over some <cough> family members.
And when I see a movie where someone is still with us, it’s such a warm, happy thrill, and an ever-rarer one. I wonder if they’re at home watching a movie too, or maybe just sunning (with a hat please!) in the garden or relaxing in the kitchen with a cuppa.
Or looking fabulous taking out the garbage.


I’ve always loved Vera Miles, and feel she never got her due as an actress. Being so absolutely natural was probably her biggest “flaw” as far as those dishing out the plaudits were concerned. As the saying goes, you get an Oscar not for the best acting but for the most acting.
She was the beating heart of The Searchers, and the quiet soul of The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.


She was absolutely devastating in The Wrong Man, especially wrenching because it was based on a true story. (Hitchcock also cast her in Vertigo, but she had to drop out when she became pregnant. I’ve often wondered how she would have approached that dual role.) And she was riveting as the desperately searching sister in Psycho, whose scream upon discovering the rocking chair in the fruit cellar will live through the ages. (I loved her cheeky nod to the film in her Columbo episode, when, wide-eyed, she coos to the detective, “I wouldn’t hurt a fly!”)
I could go on and on. (Have we met? Then you already know that.) But I’d like to share this little gem with you, one of her too-few opportunities at light comedy, A Touch of Larceny.


Directed by Guy Hamilton of James Bond fame (though he learned his craft at the elbow of Carol Reed, and even doubled for Orson Welles in several shots of The Third Man), it’s a deft, delightful little lark where our Miss Miles, in a series of Edith Head gowns, waltzes between two ardent and adorable suitors, George Sanders and James Mason. Oh my God if I were in her place, I would have kept flubbing my lines so the shoot would go on forever.
The whole movie is below; I hope you enjoy it as much as I do. And Brava, Vera Miles!
I
Summoning the Patron Saint of STFU at the Movies
Happy New Year to my classic movie family! May this year be better than the last (talk about setting a bar low), and may all good things come your way!
Yesterday afternoon, my husband Tim and I bid a relieved adieu to 2025 by going to see SONG SUNG BLUE, which was the perfect year-end cleanse. We got to the counter, chose our seats (there were only a handful taken), dropped our bulky coats, scarves, and sundry other baggage onto the seat next to mine and settled in with our popcorn. Soon after, two women who might have been played by Margaret Dumont and Kathleen Howard at their haughtiest bustled down the aisle and into our row. “You have to move these!” Margaret barked. What? Why? “We’re sitting here!” Honest to God there weren’t enough people in the whole theater to field a pickup softball team. And we’d picked our seats pretty much at random, since wherever we sat we’d have lots of space (or so we thought). It’s not like we’d hit some kind of magic lottery of movie seating that the whole town would want in on.
I shlepped everything from the seat next to me to the one next to Tim, and the two of them plopped down—with Margaret sending my bottled water, which was mercifully capped, spinning furiously in its little cubbyhole. Then the trailers began. And so did the talking. They chattered loudly over every one of them, as if what was on screen was just a minor impediment to their riveting conversation. “Okay fine, it’s just the trailers,” I told myself. “Maybe they’ll stop when the movie starts.”
But… no. The yammering bled right into the opening scene. I already kind of loathed them, so I reminded myself to stay calm. Then, just as it does in the movies, an inspiration flashed before me: Liam Neeson in TAKEN.
Without raising my voice, I summoned every ounce of menace I had in me and growled, “Okay this is where the talking STOPS. You’re not in your freakin’ living room.” They sort of froze and looked at each other, appalled. (Did I hear a harrumph? I believe I may have). And then… utter, blissful silence. At which point a guy somewhere behind us, in a voice usually reserved for the Knicks making a three-point buzzer-beater, cried “YES!”
The bombastic biddies spoke not another word for the rest of the movie.
I should add that I’m not one of those movie nazis who erupts when people make passing comments during a film or quickly catch someone up on the plot if they’d stepped out to the restroom. But these two were… not that. And it is my fervent wish that anyone trapped next to them in the future summon St. Liam of Neeson to be their savior.
Calling All Romantics… A Mystery from the 1939 World’s Fair, Solved! (Well, Mostly)
Recently I stumbled onto a haunting old mystery I just had to share with my hopelessly romantic classic movie family.
In one of the few real bookstores left in New York, I was riffling through boxes of old postcards, looking for any from the 1939 World’s Fair, which I’m mildly obsessed with. I found one with a note on the back—from a woman to her brother, about a secret love affair. Sensing I’d come in on the middle of the story, I needed to know more! So I dug through every single box and pulled out every postcard from the Fair, and then asked if they had any more in the back. After sneezing my way through stacks of dusty boxes, I found a total of nine from the same woman!

These were never sent as postcards; there are no stamps or cancellations. But Ann must have mailed them to John, perhaps in envelopes to conceal their contents—because in one, she mentions hearing that he broke his leg in a polo match, and how that would explain why she didn’t hear back from him.
John’s address is on one of them—and it’s in Beacon Hill. So they were society types. But Douglas, her secret love, lived in Winthrop, then a working-class fishing village.
Here is Ann’s story:
Dear John,
I’m in love it’s as simple as that and it’s one of the greatest things God intended us to have and to cherish. His name is Douglas and his eyes are blue.
Love, Ann
Dear John,
I met him again today and for the first time I realized his eyes were blue. Robin eggs blue. Let’s eat today at the most wonderful place in New York. Where’s that I asked. He shook his head, I don’t know but we will find it and I knew we would.
Love, Ann
Dear John,
What will mother think when she knows that her Ann has fallen for a man that never has appeared in the society column. Oh John we must never tell her.
Love, Ann
Dear John,
It rained to-day and so we went to the movies and saw Gary Cooper and Jean Arthur in “Mr. Deeds Goes to Town.” Douglas asked me to supper so I’ll have an awful lot to tell you.
Love, Ann
Dear John,
Mother arrived last night on one of her surprise trips. Of course Doug had to be with me. She wanted to know who he was and he didn’t care a damn who she was and said so. Oh come, I need you.
Love, Ann
Dear John,
Douglas has gone and I don’t know where he lives in Winthrop and besides I’m not so sure he went home. I must find him but mother watches me like a hawk.
Love, Ann
Dear John,
If you could only come and help me find him for now I realize I would never let mother stand in the way of our happiness but first I must find him.
Dear John,
I heard you broke your leg in a polo game. No wonder you couldn’t help me. Well John I visited the fair. I saw him but was unable to reach him. Perhaps I will see him again. It is my one last hope for tomorrow I leave with mother.
Love, Ann
Dear John,
I’ve seen him at last. He said for me to go home and that in August I must go to [she gives his address] and there I may see him and we will talk about what lies ahead for us two.
Love, Ann
There, maddeningly, is where the story ended—and the search began. I had the brother’s address and last name (a frustratingly common one), and Doug’s address, with no last name. I assume Mr. Deeds Goes to Town was re-released in sometime in 1939. (I thought maybe she meant Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, but that didn’t open until October.) So the movie reference didn’t give me much of a clue about when the postcards were sent. But Boston’s polo season starts in late May, so I’m guessing they were sent in June; if it were July, wouldn’t she have said “next month” instead of “in August”? That means Ann endured an agonizing couple of months to wait to see Doug again. What happened when she did?
He pored over Ancestry.com. He plowed into the Boston society pages on Newspaper.com. He dug and dug through all kinds of records, and now I know more about Ann than I know about my own family.
But first, the bad news about Douglas.
Dear Reader, she didn’t marry him.
STREAMING SATURDAYS! Peter Cushing in CASH ON DEMAND, the Christmas Sleeper You Didn’t Know You Needed
Welcome to another edition of STREAMING SATURDAYS, where we bring you free, fabulous films to watch right here!
Imagine if Ebenezer Scrooge were scared straight not by four ghosts but by a criminal mastermind who utterly beguiled Bob Cratchit. That’s pretty much the set-up in CASH ON DEMAND, a woefully overlooked Hammer classic from 1961.


Two days before Christmas, a genial man calling himself Colonel Gore-Hepburn (André Morell) strides into a small Haversham bank, claiming to be an insurance inspector. He’s quickly ushered to the office of the branch manager, Harry Fordyce (Peter Cushing), who’s so tense and brittle it’s a wonder Hepburn’s hearty handshake doesn’t snap him in half. But once the door closes behind them, he reveals he’s the ringleader of a gang of thieves who are holding Fordyce’s wife and son hostage—and demands help in stealing £93,000 to guarantee their safety.
Meanwhile the unsuspecting staff are preparing to make merry out on the shop floor—or as merry as they can with a petty little prig like Fordyce as their boss. Gore-Hepburn pops out every so often to ask for their help with the books, but also asks after their families and Christmas plans and generally becomes the life of their sad little party. His mood hardens when he’s alone with Fordyce, threatening him with the awful fate that awaits his wife if he doesn’t cooperate.


Cushing is brilliant as the cold, dry little bureaucrat, pinching his lips into a straight line and peering icily over his glasses. Even his cheekbones seem sharper than usual. Here was his chance to shake off the tweedy deerstalker caps, capes and waistcoats that marked most of his tenure at Hammer (fabulous though it was, including a turn as Sherlock Holmes with Morell as Dr. Watson), and he makes the most of it. And Morell is terrific as the glad-handing bank robber who cares more about the staff than their actual boss does.
The film takes some delicious twists and turns that I won’t spoil here, so settle in for a very Hammer Christmas!
STREAMING SATURDAYS is a semi-regular feature on Sister Celluloid. You can catch up on movies you may have missed by clicking here! And why not bookmark the page to make sure you never miss another?
STREAMING SATURDAYS! Noir Drops the Hammer in HELL IS A CITY
Welcome to another edition of Streaming Saturdays, where we embed a free, fun movie for you to watch right here!


From 1960, it’s HELL IS A CITY, directed by Val Guest, who also adapted the screenplay from Maurice Procter’s novel of the same name. Blurring the line between noir and the burgeoning British New Wave, the fast-paced crime drama was shot entirely in working-class Manchester, lending it a grittiness that sets it apart from the sleeker, more stylized detective films that would come to mark the decade.
At its center is Stanley Baker (Inspector Harry Martineau), in his second and last film for Hammer before his fame outpaced their budgets. If you want to see what a superstar on the verge looks like, just spend a quick ninety minutes with him here. (Bonus points for the fact that he’s always reminded me of my movie husband, Rod Taylor.)


The supporting cast isn’t too shabby either, with Donald Pleasence as a mousy, bespectacled accountant who is somehow married to Billie Whitelaw, a mystery that could take up a whole nother film. Also fun is Vanda Godsell as a blowsy barmaid who harbors a hankering for Harry—well not so much harbors as lets it loose all over town.
The plot is fairly typical—an especially nasty crook has been sprung from prison, with scores to settle and loot to recover. But everything about the film feels vibrant. Click below and enjoy!
STREAMING SATURDAYS is a semi-regular feature on Sister Celluloid. You can catch up on movies you may have missed by clicking here! And why not bookmark the page to make sure you never miss another?
For Donna Hill, With Love and Gratitude
On the last Friday of the year, Donna Hill said goodnight to her beloved William, who may have been right there beside her, or maybe he was in his little heated bed, or in the velvet wingchair with the brocade pillow, in the living room lined with lovingly framed posters and portraits of stars gone by.
And then Donna went to sleep for the last time, setting off waves of grief from all corners of the classic film world.


Donna had struggled with diabetes for years, but rarely spoke of it. She’d much rather talk about Rudolph Valentino, about whom she wrote the best book of all the ones out there, capturing the romantic soul that so matched her own. Or Dorothy Gish, the subject of the bio she was working on, whose photos she loved to collect. Or Renata Tebaldi, the soprano she adored above all others. She’d rather help other writers and historians by sharing her encyclopedic insights into silent film—which were so extensive that even Kevin Brownlow sometimes tapped her brain for information. And like Kevin, she was always breezy and generous, never show-offy or stuffy.
In the past few days, with eyes bleary from tears, I’ve probably read every tribute out there, as other grieving members of the film community shared their stories about Donna. Pretty much all of them have one word in common: kindness. My memories are no different.
Donna was one of the first people I spoke with after losing my Mom. It was during the pandemic, and she was working from home, but still very much working—she always seemed a little swamped. I kept interrupting our call to say, “You know, I understand if you need to get back to work…” and she’d insist she had all the time in the world. After a long talk that I dearly needed, I finally took the initiative to ring off, knowing she’d have stayed on all day otherwise, just to be there for me.
She was always there in other ways too. When I was struggling to write a tribute piece on Norm Macdonald, afraid I wouldn’t do him justice and would unleash a horde of his passionate fans, Donna talked me through it. Not in a rah-rah, you-got-this kind of way, but with genuine compassion and understanding, along with some motherly prodding. It got to the point where I was more concerned about disappointing Donna than angering any rabid Macdonald fans.


With Donna, I also learned not to admire anything out loud, lest she send it off to me. I swooned when she posted a portrait of Robert Montgomery, only to find it on my front porch in a well-padded envelope the following week. When I scoped out the final season of Endeavour—a series we both loved—on a European website months before it was due to air in the US, I sent her the links, and she responded by sending me a full set of Endeavour DVDs. I posted a 1940s brooch my husband had bought for me, and she sent me a lovely celluloid heart pin from the same era.
Very few people on earth are as kind as Donna was. But to find someone that kind who was also funny and goofy is pretty much a miracle. We were both in love with the soapy and fabulous Rome Adventure, being sure to alert each other whenever it was due to show up on television, and we shared a daydream about opening a bookstore in Italy like the one Constance Ford ran, or maybe just going to work at hers since we loved her character. (Donna was thrilled to learn that my Dad had known Ford through his work and that she was just as great a broad in real life.)
We also talked about going to a Giants baseball game with Cari Beauchamp (Cari and I used to count down the days till pitchers and catchers reported to camp), and we cried on the phone together when we lost Cari.



But I’m so glad Donna had so many adventures of her own, including the silent film festival in Pordenone, for which she had saved and planned for so long. By the time her most recent visit rolled around, she of course had already made friends with pretty much all the regular attendees, and half her luggage was taken up with DVDs and other film bits and pieces she was bringing along as gifts. And she had scoped out the best place for gelato.
Her only pang of sadness on the trip was being away from her beloved William, named after William Powell. She asked the pet sitter to send her videos of him, though they only seemed to make her miss him more. From the time she adopted him last February, she posted pictures of him almost daily, and you could feel the love pouring through the screen. Just last month, amid Christmas greetings, she called him the best gift she’d ever received. He is being adopted into a safe, loving home, though it will be hard for anyone to match the mom who adored him so.


I watched The Bishop’s Wife for the zillionth time last week, and at one point the professor says Julia is one of those rare people who can make a heaven here on earth. So was Donna. To have her as a friend, or to know her at all, in person or otherwise—it just made your life so much better.
As midnight rang in 2025, I cried at the thought of going into the new year without her, and cursed the old year for snatching her away.
I hope all of us who were Donna’s friends try to do a little better, be a little kinder, carry her spirit with us. But I just can’t escape the fact that she should still be here, sharing whatever this year brings, good or bad or scary, and planning and saving for her next trip to Pordenone.
The last time I spoke with Donna, a couple of weeks ago, she mentioned she hadn’t put up a tree for fear it would be too tempting for William. I suggested she put some of her favorite vintage ornaments, which she’d been collecting for decades, into bowls on the table. “I may do that, until I figure out how to make it work with a tree,” she said. “Maybe next year.”
Can We Save TCM? Will This Movie Have a Happy Ending?
You head outside on a winter’s day with 90 percent of your body covered, but suddenly it’s 20 percent. Think you’d notice? You were making $90,000 a year yesterday but $20,000 a year today. Think you’d notice? Your bathroom was 90 square feet yesterday but 20 square feet today. Think you’d notice?
And yet Warner Bros. Discovery pats frantic TCM viewers on the head and says there will be “no discernible difference” after slashing the staff size from 90 to 20 and axing the entire leadership team. The only thing missing was sending us to bed with a warm glass of milk.
“We remain fully committed to this business, the TCM brand, and its purpose to protect and celebrate culture-defining movies,” cooed chairwoman and chief content office Kathleen Finch in a press release. Uh-huh. And Gregory Anton is a loving and devoted husband.


We’ve also been assured that the TCM hub will remain on the Max streaming service. Right now that includes 561 films out of the roughly 130,000 titles TCM has at its fingertips. I feel better already!
CEO David Zaslav has made a great show of his love for film history—claiming he has TCM on in the background all day from his perch behind Jack Warner’s desk, celebrating 100 years of Warner Bros. at the recent TCM Film Festival, and generally saying all the right things to reporters. (One recently banged out a long Twitter thread to claim, with horror and shock, that she now feels she was lied to. Really? A CEO was less than frank with you? You don’t say!)
Zaslav is not only a total corporate weasel but really, really bad at his actual job. WBD’s stock price has nosedived under his “leadership,” and supposed blockbusters like The Flash have bombed. And I’m guessing its CGI line alone probably rivals the entire annual budget for TCM, which is barely a blip of the $37 billion for the company overall. Zaslav slashing TCM’s staff is like a zillionaire losing big at the craps table and deciding to skip his mum’s birthday present this year to make up for it.
He is the classic example of knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. Here’s a clip of the stunning “Forgotten Man” number that closes Gold Diggers of 1933. Leaving aside the brilliant Joan Blondell and Etta Moten, cast your eyes on any of the extras—the soldiers marching along, the women reaching out to them. Every single one of them has contributed more to our culture in this one scene than Zaslav has in his entire fecking useless life. But not content to merely create nothing, he’s actively destroying, minimizing or rendering invisible the work of others, threatening to erase a critical part of our shared cultural heritage and stored memory bank.
Remember the line in Pygmalion when Eliza is warned to avoid thorny topics and stick to the weather and everyone’s health? My Mom and I, who locked horns often, usually focused on music and old movies—and TCM looms large in my memories of her. Hours and days and years of sitting on the sofa next to her, the glow of the black and white as soft and soothing as Christmas lights.
And when her sister Ruth, who once had a life-changing encounter with Van Johnson, developed dementia, we’d spend long afternoons watching musicals on TCM. By then she’d forgotten who I was but something clicked when she saw Judy Garland. One day she nodded and tapped her knees to the beat as I sang along to “The Trolley Song,” matching Judy’s every sway and swoon in a number I knew by heart. Just then her home aide walked in, and from that day on I was known as “the clang-clang lady.”
TCM is not just a vital keeper of our cultural flame. It’s part of our lives and our most cherished memories, often of those we’ve lost. Zaslav’s duty is to keep the torch burning and pass it along—not to burn bridges with it.






























Recent Comments